Juridical Analysis of The Execution of Confiscated Objects: A Case Study of Narcotics in the Blora State Court of Positive Law And Islamic Law Perspective

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Sep 10, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v4i3.19055
Keywords:
Execution, Narcotics Confiscated Objects, Blora District Court, Positive Law, Islamic Law

Main Article Content

Karyono Karyono
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Aidul Fitriciadia Azhari
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Natangsa Surbakti
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Abstract

The Blora District Prosecutor's Office is a state agency with authority to carry out lawsuits against perpetrators of criminal cases, including narcotics crime cases. In the case of narcotics, the Prosecutor's office is also authorized to store and destroy confiscated narcotics. This is to the laws and regulations that narcotics confiscated objects should be stored in the State Confiscated Objects Storage House (Rupbasan) by Article 44 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The destruction of narcotics confiscated objects is carried out no later than seven days after obtaining a legal decision and has permanent legal force from Blora District Court, as regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. In this study, researchers took several legal decisions at the Blora District Court, which had differences in executing narcotics confiscated objects. This qualitative research combines data on legal decisions and interviews with law enforcement officials. This study also uses positive legal theory and Islamic Law to analyze the problems that occur in criminal narcotics cases, especially in the execution of narcotics confiscated objects. So the results of this study conclude that there is discretion from the results of legal decisions with laws and regulations governing the execution of confiscated objects in narcotics crime cases at the Blora District Court.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Khazanah Hukum Vol 4, No 3 November (2022)
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Author Biography

Natangsa Surbakti, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

References

al-Hasari, A. (1979). Al-Siyasat al-Jaz’iyyah. Beirut: Dar al-Jalil.

Al-Jaziri, A. al-R. (1994). Al-Fiqh ala Madhahib al-Arba’ah. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

al-Munawir, A. W. (1984). al-Munawir Kamus Arab Indonesia. Yogyakarta.

al-Nasa’i. (1998). Sunan al-Nasa’i bi Syarh al-Hafiz Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’arif.

Al-Naysaburi, A.-I. A. H. M. ibn H. al-K. (1994). Sahih Muslim. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Sajastani, A. D. S. al-A. (1994). Sunan Abu Dawud. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

Hamzah, A. (2005). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hanafi, A. (1967). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Harahap, Y. (2015a). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, Y. (2015b). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

M. Zein, S. E. (2001). Kejahatan terhadap Harta dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus.

Majah, I. (1995). Sunan Ibnu Majah. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2009). Himpunan Keputusan dan Fatwa MUI. Jakarta: Sekretariat MUI.

Materi Advokasi Pencegahan Narkoba, (Jakarta: BNN, 2005). (2005). Jakarta: BNN.

Mawar, S. dkk. (2009). Mekanisme Penyimpanan dan Pemusnaan Benda Sitaan Narkotika (Studi Kasus Pada Kejaksaan Tinggi Aceh). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.

Phahlevy, R. R. dkk. (2019). Pergeseran Konsep Narkotika dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Res Judicata, Vol.2 No.2.

Siahaan, R. . (2009). Hukum Pidana I. Cibubur: RAO Press.

Syafii, A. (2009). Penyalahgunaan Narkoba dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Hunafa, Vol.6 No.

Taimiyah, I. (1978). Majmu’ al-Fatawa. Beirut: Dar al-Arabiyyah.

Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. (n.d.).

Wiantama, I. P. K. L. (2021). Mekanisme Penyimpanan dan Pemusnahan Barang Sitaan Narkotika (Studi Kasus Pada Kejaksaan Negeri Badung). Jurnal Kontruksi Hukum, Vol. 2 No.

Wibowo, T. (2020). Pelaksanaan Pengelolaan Benda Sitaan Negara dalam Peradilan Tindak Pidana oleh Kejaksaan: Studi Kasus di Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Kediri. Jurnal Uniska Law Review, Vol. 1 No.

Zubaidah, I. N. (2020). Kedudukan Penyitaan Barang Bukti Sebagai Hasil Kejahatan Narkoba,†Jurnal Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, Vol. 5 No.

Zuhayli, W. (1998). al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adilatuhu. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.