DNA Testing and Nafyu al-Nasab: A Comparative Study of Ali Jum'ah’s Fatwa and Its Socio-Legal Implications in Global Jurisdictions

DNA Testing and Nafyu al-Nasab: A Comparative Study of Ali Jum'ah’s Fatwa and Its Socio-Legal Implications in Global Jurisdictions

Authors

  • Wawan Hermawan Islamic Religious Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Mohammad Rindu Fajar Islamy Islamic Religious Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Baidhillah Riyadhi Financial Accounting, Department of Accounting, Politeknik Negeri Pontianak
  • Kamaludin Departments of Hadith & Hadith Science, Faculty of Ulum Islamiyyah Al-Azhar University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v8i2.52785

Keywords:

Ali Jum'ah, DNA forensics, Islamic Family Law, Liʿān, Nafyu al-Nasab

Abstract

This article analyzes the existence and juridical status of DNA testing in the determination (ithbāt) (establishment of lineage status) and negation (nafy) (denial, annulment, or rejection of lineage relationship) of lineage within the framework of Islamic family law through the perspective of the fatwas of Ali Jum’ah. The rapid development of forensic genetic technology has challenged the classical Fiqh framework, which traditionally recognizes liʿān (as the only legitimate mechanism for denying lineage). This study aims to reassess the relevance of Ali Jumʿah’s legal reasoning in the contemporary context by comparing legal approaches in Indonesia, selected Middle Eastern countries, and Western jurisdictions. This research employs a juridical-normative approach combined with comparative legal analysis and socio-legal perspectives. The study analyzes authoritative literature, fatwas of Islamic institutions, statutory regulations, and selected judicial decisions related to paternity determination and denial. The findings demonstrate that Middle Eastern legal systems generally recognize DNA evidence as qarīnah qawiyyah for verifying lineage but reject its use for nafyu al-nasab, consistent with Ali Jumʿah’s fatwa. Indonesia adopts a moderate approach, allowing DNA as corroborative evidence for determining biological relations but not as an independent basis for denying nasab in Islamic law. In contrast, Western legal systems treat DNA evidence as the primary determinant of paternity regardless of marital status. This study contributes to the development of an integrative framework for Islamic family law reform, proposing that DNA testing should function as strong corroborative evidence within a maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (Objectives of Shariah) framework that prioritizes the protection of lineage (ḥifẓ al-nasab), family stability, and the rights of the child.

References

Altınoğlu, E. (2018). Religious commitment or a textualist-traditionalist understanding of Islam? The impact of religious orientations upon social tolerance in Turkey. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 45(5), 695 – 715. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2017.1330135

Aslati, Agustar, A., Silawati, Arisman, & Arafah, S. (2024). Utilizing Science and Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah in Resolving Contemporary Issues of Islamic Family Law. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 18(1), 17 – 36. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v18i1.10571

Athi, M. A. (2007). Al-Maqashid Al-Syariah Wa Atsaruha fi Al-Fiqh Al-Islami. Kairo: Dar Al-Hadits.

Azizah, N. (2018). Putusan Mk No. 46/2010 Tentang Hubungan Keperdataan Antara Anak Luar Nikah Dengan Ayah Biologis (Analisis Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam, Hukum Positif, Uidhr, Dan Udhr). FITRAH Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 4(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.24952/FITRAH.V4I2.860

Engelcke, D. (2019). Reforming family law: Social and political change in Jordan and Morocco. In Reforming Family Law: Social and Political Change in Jordan and Morocco. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108634342

Fadel, M. (2022). “DNA Evidence and the Islamic Law of Paternity in Light of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿa.” Muslim World, 112(3), 311 – 323. https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12441

Fahrudin, Islamy, M. R. F., & Parhan, M. (2022). Moderation of Tasawwuf Ali Jum’ah Egyptian Scholar: The Middle Way of Conflict Between Reformers and Traditionalists and its Relevance to Sufi Culture in Indonesia. Res Militaris, 12(2), 1846 – 1861.

Fathullah, A., & Abduh, M. (2022). The Relationship of Children and Their Biological Father (Comparative Study of Positive Law of Indonesia, Thailand and Jordan). Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 22(2), 213 – 230. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v22i2.8918

Furqoni, A. H., Palupi, R., Yudianto, A., Sosiawan, A., Tirthaningsih, N. W., Fore, F., & Setyowati, D. (2021). Analysis of Sibling Pair Relationships of Balineses Indonesia, Using 12 STR Loci for Human Identification Process. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research, 14(2), 855 – 859.

Guénon, M. (2018). Paternity tests between religious law and medical technology: Parentage lawsuits in the Algerian family law; [Vaterschaftstests zwischen religiösem Recht und Medizintechnik: Abstammungsklagen im algerischen Familienrecht]. Welt Des Islams, 58(2), 173 – 205. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700607-00582P02

Haneef, S. sikandar S. (2016). DNA Test of paternity in islamic law implications for illegitimate children born less than minimum gestation period in Malaysia. Hamdard Islamicus, 39(2), 7–35. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84992374837&partnerID=40&md5=38bc7ab48c48c9cdd014f3901b017026

Hermawan, W., Islamy, M. R. F., Faqihuddin, A., & Ulum, M. (2025). Implementing Islamic Law in Diaspora Naturalization: A Middle East, Southeast Asia, and West. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 25(1), 71 – 86. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v25i1.41465

Islamy, M. R. F., Suprima, Hermawan, W., Budiyanti, N., Parhan, M., & Logayah, D. S. (2025). The Role of Islamic Law in Addressing Global Warming: Perspectives from Indonesia and Global Contexts. Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 24(2), 358 – 386. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v24i2.11314

Ismail, D., & Agustina, F. (2021). Cloning is Reviewed From the Perspective of Islam and Health. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology, 1(1), 71 – 74. https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v1i1.104

Jayadi, J., Ilmiah, I., Hadijah, S., Kasnir, M., & Roslim, D. I. (2019). DNA barcoding of telmatherinidae family in lake towuti, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux, 12(4), 1208 – 1215.

Kosasih, E., Islamy, M. R. F., & Wiwaha, R. S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Society 5.0: Compromising Technological Innovation Through the Wasathiyyah Approach within the Framework of Islamic Law. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(2), 519 – 540. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i2.9596

Lutfi, & Muallim, A. (2021). The Application of the Kompilasi Hukum Islam in the Religious Court for the Child Custody and the Execution of Its Verdict; [Penerapan Kompilasi Hukum Islam pada Peradilan Agama dalam Perkara Hadhonah dan Eksekusi Pelaksanaan Putusannya]. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 20(2), 275 – 300. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol20.iss2.art4

Mahalakshmi, B., Therese, K. L., Madhavan, H. N., & Biswas, J. (2006). Diagnostic value of specific local antibody production and nucleic acid amplification technique-nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR) in clinically suspected ocular toxoplasmosis. Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, 14(2), 105 – 112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273940500545692

Moeinifar, M., & Ardebeli, F. A. (2012). Lineage and the rights of cloned child in the Islamic jurisprudence. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility, 13(4), 183 – 192.

Mustafa, C. (2021). The view of judicial activism and public legitimacy. Crime, Law and Social Change, 76(1), 23 – 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09955-0

Mustamam, Danialsyah, Harahap, N., Saputri, M. A., & Ariestino, L. (2025). Reinterpreting Ḥifẓ al-nasl in Contemporary Marriage Contracts: Navigating Islamic Normativity and State Law. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(2), 1258 – 1280. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11158

Nasir, M., Roslaili, Y., Suparwany, Khathir, R., Idris, A., & Anzaikhan, M. (2024). Legal Status and Consequences of Unilateral Divorce: Comparative Studies Between Egypt, Jordan, Tunisia and Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(2), 457 – 470. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no2.614

Nasution, K., & Nasution, S. (2021). Implementation of Indonesian Islamic Family Law to Guarantee Children’s Rights. Al-Jami’ah, 59(2), 347 – 374. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.592.347-374

Pan, P., Tao, X., Zhang, Q., Xing, W., Sun, X., Pei, L., & Jiang, Y. (2007). Clinical comparison of branched DNA and reverse transcriptase-PCR and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay for the quantitation of circulating recombinant form_BC HIV-1 RNA in plasma. AIDS, 21(SUPPL. 8), S27–S32. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000304693.16767.66

Rodríguez, P. V. (2023). Jurisprudential Analysis of the Annulment Action Based on a Recognition Error in the Genetic Correspondence with the Child; [Análisis Jurisprudencial De La Acción De Nulidad Del Reconocimiento Por Error En La Correspondencia Genética Con el Hijo]. Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado, 41, 9 – 50. https://doi.org/10.32995/S0718-80722023668

Saeed, A., & Akbar, A. (2021). Contextualist approaches and the interpretation of the Qur’ān. Religions, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070527

Sahu, S., Agarwal, N., Mahobiya, K., Suchitra, & Mishra, P. K. (2024). Establishment of forensic DNA technology in India: progress and future prospects. Current Science, 126(12), 1424 – 1430. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v126/i12/1424-1430

Shabana, A. (2013). Negation of Paternity in Islamic Law between LiÊ¿ān and DNA Fingerprinting. Islamic Law and Society, 20(3), 157 – 201. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-0008A0001

Shackel, L., Smith, M., Scudder, N., & McNevin, D. (2025). Non-consensual collection and analysis of DNA: a contemporary legal lacuna. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2025.2574624

Škevin, S., De Keyzer, L., De Waele, L., Tytgat, O., Van Hoofstat, D., Deforce, D., & Van Nieuwerburgh, F. (2025). Recombinase polymerase amplification of forensic short tandem repeat loci. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24283-2

Sofiana, N. E., & Sunni, M. I. (2021). The Application of Article 53 of KHI (Islamic Law Compilation) Regarding Pregnant Marriage in Lottery Marriage. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 19(1), 122 – 135. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v19i1.1453

Srivastava, L. (2022). DNA Legislations, Challenges, and Opportunities. In Handbook of DNA Forensic Applications and Interpretation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0043-3_10

Steadman, D., & Wagner, S. (2020). Taking stock: DNA testing and its complex truths. In Silent Witness: Forensic DNA Evidence in Criminal Investigations and Humanitarian Disasters. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190909444.003.0013

Syaifudin, M., Wijayanti, M., Dwinanti, S. H., Muslim, Mahendra, M., & Marliana, S. (2020). Short communication: DNA barcodes and phylogenetic of striped snakehead and ocellated snakehead fish from south sumatra, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 21(3), 1227 – 1235. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210350

Toya, W. (2017). Ethical, legal and social issues in Japan on the determination of blood relationship via DNA testing. Asian Bioethics Review, 9(1–2), 19 – 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-017-0009-9

Tyson, A. (2021). Blasphemy and judicial legitimacy in Indonesia. Politics and Religion, 14(1), 182 – 205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048319000427

Yilmaz, I. (2017). Denial of the paternity by DNA fingerprint test in Islamic Family Law. Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi, 21(1), 9 – 44. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.288266.

Zhang, B., Li, Z., Li, K., Chen, P., & Chen, F. (2019). Forensic parameters and mutation analysis of 23 short tandem repeat (PowerPlex® Fusion System) loci in Fujian Han Chinese population. Legal Medicine, 37, 33 – 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2019.01.005

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15
Loading...