Operationalising the Ultimum Remedium Principle in Indonesian Mining Law: Administrative Sanctions, Mining Work Plan and Budget Compliance, and Criminal Enforcement Thresholds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v8i2.54320Keywords:
administrative sanctions, criminal enforcement, environmental restoration, Ultimum Remedium, mining law, RKAB complianceAbstract
This study examines how the Ultimum Remedium principle is operationalised in Indonesian mining law enforcement, particularly with respect to administrative sanctions, compliance with the mining Work Plan and Budget (Rencana Kerja dan Anggaran Biaya, RKAB), environmental restoration, and criminal enforcement thresholds. Although the principle is widely recognised as requiring the use of criminal law as a last resort, its practical application in the mining sector remains unclear. This study adopts a socio-legal research design combining semi-structured interviews, questionnaire data, regulatory review, and comparative legal analysis. The empirical data consist of interviews with 24 informants and questionnaire responses from 68 respondents representing government officials, mining company representatives, civil society organisations, and affected communities. The comparative analysis examines selected materials on mining and environmental enforcement from Australia, Canada, Chile, and Indonesia. The findings show that stakeholders generally accept the Ultimum Remedium principle, but they attach different operational meanings to it. Government officials frame it as a proportional enforcement procedure, mining companies associate it with legal certainty, civil society organisations emphasise accountability, and affected communities evaluate it through environmental restoration outcomes. The PT GMS case further illustrates weak sequencing between RKAB-related non-compliance, administrative correction, restoration obligations, and possible criminal escalation. Comparative legal findings indicate that Australia, Canada, and Chile situate punitive enforcement within broader systems of compliance supervision, administrative correction, restoration, and documented escalation mechanisms. The study implies that Indonesian mining enforcement requires a staged but flexible model that distinguishes correctable administrative non-compliance from serious, repeated, fraudulent, corrupt, obstructive, or environmentally harmful conduct. The originality of this study lies in its integration of stakeholder perceptions, RKAB compliance, an illustrative mining case, and comparative enforcement models to operationalise Ultimum Remedium as an institutional sequencing framework rather than merely a criminal law doctrine.
References
Amiq, B. (2018). Administrative sanction in environmental law. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 6(6), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i6.2018.1331
Anggono, B. D., & Firdaus, F. R. (2020). Omnibus law in Indonesia: A comparison to the United States and Ireland. Lentera Hukum, 7(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v7i3.19895
Anggraeni, R. D., & Amrullah, M. K. (2023). Promoting the urgency of restorative justice to environmental law enforcement officials through civic engagement education. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 42(1), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i1.56292
Chen, X. C., Choi, K. W., Wright, S., & Wu, H. (2023). The effectiveness of sanctions on disclosure regulation: Australian evidence. Accounting & Finance, 63(4), 3841–3872. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13073
Faisal, F., Rahayu, D. P., & Yokotani, Y. (2022). Criminal sanctions’ reformulation in the reclamation of the mining community. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no1.2222
González-González, A., Clerici, N., & Quesada, B. R. (2021). Growing mining contribution to Colombian deforestation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(6), Article 064046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfcf8
Hidayat, S., Haris, O. K., Handrawan, Herman, Rizky, A., & Seriyati, E. (2023). Kewenangan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) dan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) dalam menentukan kerugian keuangan negara. Halu Oleo Legal Research, 5(2), 592–604. https://doi.org/10.33772/holresch.v5i2.551
Huang, Y., Li, X., & Liu, Y. (2022). The impact of environmental regulation or bargaining power on green total factor productivity: Evidence from Taiwan-funded enterprises in Chinese mainland. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, Article 982430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.982430
Kirin, R., Baranov, P., Hrytsenko, H., & Khomenko, V. (2024). Exploring and proposing appropriate provisions addressing the mineral resources subjects and governing entities within the framework of gemological law of Ukraine. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.070103
Mamo, D. K., & Ayele, E. A. (2024). A dynamic analysis of capital, corruption, and labor market interactions. Scientific African, 25, Article e02312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02312
Mancini, L., & Sala, S. (2018). Social impact assessment in the mining sector: Review and comparison of indicators frameworks. Resources Policy, 57, 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.02.002
Martín, A., Arias, J., López, J., Santos, L., Venegas, C., Duarte, M., Ortíz-Ardila, A., de Parra, N., Campos, C., & Zambrano, C. C. (2020). Evaluation of the effect of gold mining on the water quality in Monterrey, Bolívar (Colombia). Water, 12(9), Article 2523. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092523
Munandar, M. H., Arwana, Y. C., & Yusrina, A. (2021). Legal offerings increase the effectiveness of determination of coercive money and administrative sanctions on state administrative decisions. Lex Scientia Law Review, 5(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.46287
Noor, H. J., Afkar, K., & Glaser, H. (2021). Application of sanctions against state administrative officials failing to implement administrative court decisions. BESTUUR, 9(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i1.49686
Oanta, G. A. (2022). The application of administrative sanctions in the fight against IUU fishing: An assessment of Spanish practice. Marine Policy, 144, Article 105211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105211
Pardede, M., Situmorang, M., Aristeus, S., Rumadan, I., Lumban Toruan, H. D., Diogenes, Djamilus, & Nugrahani, E. L. P. (2023). Perspectives of sustainable development vs. law enforcement on damage, pollution and environmental conservation management in Indonesia. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 14(10), 3770–3790. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2023.417
Rohmy, A. M., Setiyono, H., & Supriyadi, S. (2021). Corporate criminal sanction in Omnibus Law for forest destruction in Indonesia: Review of Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 21(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v21i1.789
Salman, M., Zha, D., & Wang, G. (2022). Indigenous versus foreign innovation and ecological footprint: Dynamic threshold effect of corruption. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 14, Article 100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100177
Șcheau, M. C., Gaftea, V. N., Achim, M. V., & Bodescu Cotoc, C. N. (2020). Cyber security reactivity in crisis times and critical infrastructures. In 2020 24th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC) (pp. 691–698). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTCC50638.2020.9259695
Sulistiani, L., & Fakhriah, E. L. (2023). The effect of extra judicial settlement in criminal cases based on the principle of Ultimum Remedium. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(3), 300–320. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n3.a1
Tegnan, H., Karjoko, L., Barkhuizen, J., & Bajrektarevic, A. H. (2021). Mining corruption and environmental degradation in Indonesia: Critical legal issues. BESTUUR, 9(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i2.55219
Teijo, C. (2023). Criminal sanctions and IUU fishing: The case of Spain. Marine Policy, 147, Article 105341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105341
Torodji, R., Hartiwiningsih, H., Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., & Nur, M. (2023). The role of the corporate penalty system on environmental regulation. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 3(3), 600–624. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v3i3.179
Turnip, F. H., Rahmayanti, R., & Ramadani, S. (2025). Application of the Ultimum Remedium principle to environmental crimes in Indonesia. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.47679/jrssh.v5i4.471
Yıldız, T. D., Güner, M. O., & Kural, O. (2024). Effects of EU-compliant mining waste regulation on Turkish mining sector: A review of characterization, classification, storage, management, recovery of mineral wastes. Resources Policy, 90, Article 104836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104836
Yoserwan. (2021). Doktrin ultimum remedium dalam hukum pidana Indonesia: Implementasinya dalam hukum pidana ekonomi. Rajawali Pers.
Yoserwan, Danil, E., Warman, K., & Yulfasni. (2019). The implementation of Ultimum Remedium principle in economic criminal law of Indonesia. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(2), 1–5. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/the-implementation-of-ultimum-remedium-principle-in-economic-criminal-law-of-indonesia-8167.html
LEGAL MATERIALS
Statutes and Regulations
Australia
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (Austl.).
Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) (Austl.).
Mining Act 1978 (WA) (Austl.).
Mining Regulations 1981 (WA) (Austl.).
Mining Rehabilitation Fund Act 2012 (WA) (Austl.).
Canada
Administrative Penalties (Mines) Regulation, B.C. Reg. 47/2017 (Can.).
Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, S.C. 1999, c. 33 (Can.).
Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in British Columbia (Can.).
Mines Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 293 (Can.).
Chile
Decreto Supremo No. 30/2012, Reglamento sobre programas de cumplimiento, autodenuncia y planes de reparación (Chile).
Law No. 19.300 on General Bases of the Environment (Chile).
Law No. 20.417 creating the Ministry of the Environment, the Environmental Assessment Service, and the Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente (Chile).
Law No. 20.600 creating Environmental Courts (Chile).
Indonesia
Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021 on the Implementation of Environmental Protection and Management (Indonesia).
Government Regulation No. 96 of 2021 on the Implementation of Mineral and Coal Mining Business Activities (Indonesia).
Government Regulation No. 25 of 2024 amending Government Regulation No. 96 of 2021 on the Implementation of Mineral and Coal Mining Business Activities (Indonesia).
Government Regulation No. 39 of 2025 amending Government Regulation No. 96 of 2021 on the Implementation of Mineral and Coal Mining Business Activities (Indonesia).
Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining (Indonesia).
Law No. 3 of 2020 amending Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining (Indonesia).
Law No. 2 of 2025 amending Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining (Indonesia).
Law No. 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption as amended by Law No. 20 of 2001 (Indonesia).
Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 17 of 2025 on the Procedures for Preparing, Submitting, and Approving Work Plans and Budgets and Reporting the Implementation of Mineral and Coal Mining Business Activities (Indonesia).
Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 6 of 2026 amending Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 17 of 2025 on the Procedures for Preparing, Submitting, and Approving Work Plans and Budgets and Reporting the Implementation of Mineral and Coal Mining Business Activities (Indonesia).
Official Documents and Enforcement Materials
Australian Government, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. (n.d.). Compliance and enforcement. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/epbc/compliance
Australian Government, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. (n.d.). Compliance outcomes. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/epbc/compliance/audit-outcomes
Government of British Columbia. (n.d.). Administrative monetary penalties. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/mineral-exploration-mining/compliance-enforcement/amp
Government of British Columbia. (n.d.). Mining compliance and enforcement. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/mineral-exploration-mining/compliance-enforcement
Government of British Columbia. (n.d.). Mines investigations unit. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/mineral-exploration-mining/compliance-enforcement/mines-investigations-unit
Government of British Columbia. (n.d.). Compliance and enforcement policy. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/mineral-exploration-mining/compliance-enforcement/compliance-and-enforcement-policy
Government of Western Australia, Department of Mines, Petroleum and Exploration. (n.d.). Guideline for preparing mine closure plans. https://www.wa.gov.au/government/publications/guideline-preparing-mine-closure-plans
Government of Western Australia, Department of Mines, Petroleum and Exploration. (n.d.). Mining Rehabilitation Fund. https://www.wa.gov.au/organisation/department-of-mines-petroleum-and-exploration/mining-rehabilitation-fund
Government of Western Australia, Department of Mines, Petroleum and Exploration. (n.d.). Prepare a mine closure plan. https://www.wa.gov.au/organisation/department-of-mines-petroleum-and-exploration/prepare-mine-closure-plan
Government of Western Australia, Department of Mines, Petroleum and Exploration. (n.d.). Abandoned Mines Program. https://www.wa.gov.au/organisation/department-of-mines-petroleum-and-exploration/abandoned-mines-program
Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente. (n.d.). Sistema Nacional de Información de Fiscalización Ambiental. https://snifa.sma.gob.cl/
Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente. (n.d.). Programas de cumplimiento. https://portal.sma.gob.cl/
Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente. (n.d.). Planes de reparación. https://portal.sma.gob.cl/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Oheo Kaimuddin Haris, Herman Herman, Hariyanto Hariyanto, Fareed Mohd Hassan, Wahyu Aliasa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).