Factors Inhibiting Communication in Empowering Farming Communities by the Department of Agriculture and Food Security of Sumedang
Main Article Content
Abstract
Farming community empowerment is an important element in the effort to improve the welfare of farmers in Sumedang Regency. However, the empowerment process often faces various communication barriers that affect the effectiveness of the program run by the Agriculture and Food Security Office of Sumedang Regency. This research aims to analyze communication barriers in empowering farming communities based on four main aspects: socio-anthro-psychological, semantic, mechanical, and ecological barriers. The research method used is qualitative with a case study approach and data collection techniques through interviews, observation, and documentation. The results showed that the main obstacles in communication to empower farming communities include social and cultural differences between farmers and extension officers, difficulties in understanding due to the use of formal language, limited access to communication technology, and environmental disturbances such as noise and unfavorable social conditions. Therefore, a more inclusive and participatory communication strategy is needed to improve the effectiveness of empowerment programs and ensure that the information conveyed can be received and understood properly by the farming community.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License
Authors who publish with Khazanah Sosial agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant Khazanah Sosial the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits others to share the work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and the original publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.
-
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of their work, such as depositing it in an institutional repository or including it in a book, provided that its initial publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.
-
Authors are permitted and encouraged to share their work online, including through institutional repositories and personal websites, before and during the submission process. Such sharing may facilitate scholarly exchange and increase the visibility and citation of published work. For further information, see The Effect of Open Access.
References
Alsop, R., & Heinsohn, N. (2005). Measuring Empowerment in Practice: Structuring Analysis and Framing Indicators. World Bank.
Bourdieu, P. (2013). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harvard University Press.
Budhirianto. (2015). Pola Komunikasi dalam Pemberdayaan Kelompok Informasi Masyarakat (KIM) untuk Program Swasembada Pangan. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 33(2), 95-110.
Cangara, H. (2018). Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Rajawali Pers.
Cornwall, A. (2016). Making Spaces, Changing Places: Situating Participation in Development. Routledge.
Crystal, D. (2019). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Cuddy, A. J., Kohut, M., & Neffinger, J. (2018). Connect, Then Lead: The New Science of Effective Influence. Harvard Business Review.
Effendy, O. U. (2019). Ilmu Komunikasi: Teori dan Praktik. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Edwards, P., & Wajcman, J. (2021). The Politics of Working Life. Oxford University Press.
Floyd, K. (2019). Interpersonal Communication. McGraw-Hill.
Goleman, D. (2018). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Bantam Books.
Griffin, E., Ledbetter, A., & Sparks, G. (2020). A First Look at Communication Theory. McGraw-Hill.
Hall, E. T. (2016). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2021). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Routledge.
Hidayat, R., & Susanti, D. (2019). Analisis Hambatan Komunikasi dalam Penyuluhan Pertanian di Kabupaten Cirebon. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 4(1), 55-68.
Hofstede, G. (2017). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. SAGE Publications.
Hutagalung, A. (2017). Dampak Kebisingan Lalu Lintas terhadap Efektivitas Komunikasi di Ruang Publik. Jurnal Psikologi Lingkungan, 5(2), 77-89.
Ibrahim, S., & Alkire, S. (2017). A Conceptual Framework for Measuring Agency and Empowerment in Developing Contexts. Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative.
Kabeer, N. (2018). Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435-464.
Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2018). Theories of Human Communication. Waveland Press.
Meyer, E. (2020). The Culture Map: Decoding How People Think, Lead, and Get Things Done Across Cultures. PublicAffairs.
Mulyana, D. (2020). Ilmu Komunikasi: Suatu Pengantar. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Narayan, D. (2005). Measuring Empowerment: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. World Bank.
Naila, A., Zulkifli, R., & Hendrawan, T. (2024). Dampak Perbedaan Bahasa dan Budaya dalam Komunikasi Pertanian di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Pembangunan, 41(1), 110-125.
Nurhayati, T., Widodo, S., & Rahman, A. (2018). Strategi Komunikasi dalam Diseminasi Teknologi Budidaya Padi Berkelanjutan di Jawa Barat. Jurnal Agribisnis, 7(1), 89-102.
Perkins, D. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2017). Empowerment Theory, Research, and Application. SAGE Publications.
Prasetyo, H., & Lestari, M. (2021). Hambatan Komunikasi dalam Program Pemberdayaan Petani di Jawa Barat. Jurnal Agraris, 12(1), 40-55.
Pratiwi, R. (2018). Model Komunikasi Partisipatif dalam Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jurnal Komunikasi Sosial, 6(2), 112-126.
Putra, A. (2021). Tantangan Infrastruktur dalam Digitalisasi Komunikasi di Pedesaan Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 9(3), 65-78.
Rakhmat, J. (2021). Psikologi Komunikasi. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Rafael, D. (2023). Perbedaan Latar Belakang Pendidikan sebagai Faktor Penghambat Komunikasi dalam Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jurnal Sosiologi Pembangunan, 18(2), 87-101.
Rohmiati, N., & Yusrina, L. (2023). Prasangka Sosial sebagai Penghambat Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Program Pemberdayaan Pertanian. Jurnal Studi Sosial, 15(1), 99-113.
Ruslan, R. (2008). Manajemen Public Relations dan Media Komunikasi. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Safitri, R. (2019). Model Virtual, Autonomous, and Disintermediacy (VAD) dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Tani. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pembangunan, 4(1), 120-135.
Setiawan, R. (2019). Pendekatan Hibrida dalam Komunikasi Pemberdayaan: Menggabungkan Komunikasi Tatap Muka dan Digital untuk Efektivitas Program Sosial. Jurnal Komunikasi Publik, 11(2), 140-155.
Silviani, D. (2020). Tantangan Teknologi dalam Komunikasi Pembangunan di Daerah Pedesaan. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 14(3), 78-92.
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sufi, M. (2021). Teori Faktor Penghambat Komunikasi Organisasi. Jurnal Manajemen Komunikasi, 10(1), 45-60.
Suwardi, H. (2018). Difusi Inovasi dalam Penguatan Kapasitas Kelompok Tani. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 36(1), 45-60.
Suryana, T., & Kurniawati, E. (2020). Analisis Hambatan Komunikasi dalam Penyuluhan Pertanian di Kabupaten Garut. Jurnal Komunikasi Agraris, 7(1), 20-35.
Tilly, C. (2015). Durable Inequality. University of California Press.
Zimmerman, M. A. (2016). Psychological Empowerment: Issues and Illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581-599.
Zikri, F. (2015). Dampak Kebisingan Lalu Lintas terhadap Konsentrasi dan Kinerja Karyawan di Perkotaan. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 10(2), 75-90.