Use of Digital Transaction Services During the Pandemic Based on Perceptions of Community in Manado, Indonesia

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Aug 29, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v4i3.17711
Keywords:
Community, Digital Transaction Service, Pandemic, and Perception

Main Article Content

Fitria Ayu Lestari Niu
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Manado

Abstract

This study aims to describe the perception of community in Manado City by using qualitative research methods and a phenomenological approach using OVO as digital transaction services. Data were collected through interview techniques with informants and direct observation, and data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The results showed that the perception that was studied according to internal factors was through attitudes, motivations, interests, experiences, and expectations. The attitude expressed by the community of Manado City as users is that they feel happier, satisfied, easy, sophisticated, practical, and flexible. The motivation came from an offer of cashback when shopping, the prices given by tenants who work with OVO are cheaper and help the community to reduce direct interaction with people in transactions during the pandemic. The people’s interest came from their desires, the needs of the digital era like today, and encouragement from their family and co-workers. The experience so far is still very good, judging from the attitude of the informants, who are happy, and satisfied with the existence of this OVO digital transaction service. The people expect that OVO can collaborate more with tenants at malls, SMEs, and shopping places that do not yet provide digital transactions, as well as provide an official office in Manado, increase promos, and provide more payment features according to user needs, and educate the people of Manado City to switch to digital transactions.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Khazanah Sosial Vol 4, No 3 October 2022
Section
Articles

Copyright and License

Authors who publish with Khazanah Sosial agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant Khazanah Sosial the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits others to share the work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and the original publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.

  2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of their work, such as depositing it in an institutional repository or including it in a book, provided that its initial publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to share their work online, including through institutional repositories and personal websites, before and during the submission process. Such sharing may facilitate scholarly exchange and increase the visibility and citation of published work. For further information, see The Effect of Open Access.

References

Afiria, Y. E. (2020). Persepsi Ulama Pondok Pesantren Dan Masyarakat Kota Blitar Tentang Pemberian Cashback Dalam Transaksi Pembayaran Elektronik (OVO). UIN SATU Tulungagung.

Ahmad, F. N. (2019). Peran Financial Technology dalam Meningkatkan Keuangan Inklusif pada UMKM. Jurnal BJB University, 5, 1–14.

Ansori, M. (2019). Perkembangan dan dampak financial technology (fintech) terhadap industri keuangan syariah di Jawa Tengah. Wahana Islamika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 5(1), 31–45.

Bank Indonesia. (2016). Penyelenggaraan Pemrosesan Transaksi Pembayaran. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.

Bank Indonesia. (2017). Penyelenggaraan Teknologi Finansial. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.

Buttle, F. (2008). Customer Relationship Management. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080949611

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (A. Fawaid, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Dayan, M. T. (2020). Pengaruh Persepsi Konsumen, Gaya Hidup Dan Kepercayaan Terhadap Penggunaan Aplikasi Pembayaran Digital. Jurnal Transaksi, 12(1), 40–50.

Fadhila Rahma, T. I. (2018). Persepsi Masyarakat Kota Medan Terhadap Penggunaan Financial Technology. At-Tawassuth,: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 3(1), 642–661. https://doi.org/10.30821/ajei.v3i1.1704

Fadillah, M. N., & Rachman, T. (2020). Persepsi Masyarakat Kabupaten Tangerang terhadap Penggunaan Financial Technology (Fintech). Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 11(1), 49–57.

Florensia, M., & Tan, E. R. (2020). Studi Perbandingan Persepsi Kualitas Layanan Online Pengguna Ovo Dan Go-Pay Di Surabaya Timur. Seminar Nasional Ilmu Terapan, 4(1), 1–6.

Inayah, R. (2020). Pengaruh Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan, Persepsi Kemanfaatan Dan Promosi Terhadap Minat Penggunaan Uang Elektronik Pada Masyarakat (Studi Kasus Di Wilayah Kota Purwokerto). Institut Agama Islam Negeri Purwokerto.

Kulsum, U., & Jauhar, M. (2014). Pengantar Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Kurnianingsih, H., & Maharani, T. (2020). Pengaruh Persepsi Manfaat, Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan, Fitur Layanan, Dan Kepercayaan Terhadap Minat Penggunaan E-Money Di Jawa Tengah. Akuntoteknologi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Teknologi, 12(1), 1–13.

Micu, I., & Micu, A. (2016). Financial technology (Fintech) and its implementation on the Romanian non-banking capital market. SEA-Practical Application of Science, 4(2), 379–384.

Notoatmodjo, S. (2003). Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Notoatmodjo, S. (2007). Promosi Kesehatan dan Ilmu Perilaku. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Paath, D. K., & Manurung, R. (2019). Analisis Persepsi Pengguna Layanan Transaksi Digital Terhadap Financial Technology (Fintech) Dengan Model E-Money (Studi kasus: layanan Go-Pay “Gojek†di Purwokerto). Jurnal HUMMANSI (Humaniora, Manajemen, Akuntansi), 2(2), 38–45.

Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomenological Research Methods. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling (Eds.), Existential-Phenomenological Perspectives in Psychology (pp. 41–60). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6989-3_3

Rakhmat, J. (2007). Persepsi dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Ridzky, D. (2021). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Penggunaan Dompet Digital Menggunakan Metode Social Network Analysis (Studi Kasus: GoPay Dan OVO). Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2013). Organizational Behavior. Boston: Pearson.

Salsabila, S. K., & Gandajaya, L. (2020). Studi Persepsi Konsumen Mengenai Mode Pembayaran Digital. Journal of Accounting and Business Studies, 5(1), 1–15.

Su, P., Wang, L., & Yan, J. (2018). How users’ Internet experience affects the adoption of mobile payment: a mediation model. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(2), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1297788

Sugiyono. (2015). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sulistyowati, R., Paais, L., & Rina, R. (2020). Persepsi Konsumen Terhadap Penggunaan Dompet Digital. ISOQUANT : Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 4(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.24269/iso.v4i1.323

Sum, S., Mathews, M. R., Pourghasem, M., & Hughes, I. (2008). Internet Technology and Social Capital:How the Internet Affects Seniors’ Social Capital and Wellbeing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01437.x

Wahdiniwaty, R., Firmansyah, D., Suryana, A., Dede, D., & Rifa’i, A. A. (2022). Mystery in Marketing Management Products Post COVID-19 as a Model of Survival Strategy Towards the Awakening of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in the Digital Economy Era. Khazanah Sosial, 4(1), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v4i1.17397