Institutional Synergy Model in Development Tourism Village in East Lombok Regency

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Nov 19, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v3i3.20303
Keywords:
Institutional Synergy, QCA, and Tourism Village

Main Article Content

Wahyunadi Wahyunadi
Development Study Department, Faculty of Economic and Bussines, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Mansur Afifi
Development Study Department, Faculty of Economic and Bussines, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
M.Firmansyah M.Firmansyah
Development Study Department, Faculty of Economic and Bussines, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia

Abstract

The objectives to be achieved in this research were to describe the pattern of institutional synergy and the factors that determine the synergy between institutions/stakeholders in developing Tourism Villages in East Lombok Regency. This research was qualitative-quantitative prospective research in which the perception of stakeholders/institutions towards synergies—data analysis using the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) method assisted by Tosmana version 1.54 software. QCA is a new way to research social phenomena that combines the power of quantitative and qualitative methods. In this study, the QCA method was used to find a model (pattern) and causality structure between the level of synergy between institutions (stakeholders) in the East Lombok Regency. Data processing using QCA software obtained results in the form of a QCA Output Truth Table showing the contribution of each stakeholder actor in supporting the realization of institutional synergy in the development of tourist villages. The level of contribution was measured through 4  (four) parameters. Based on the analysis of the QCA Truth Table results, the factors that form institutional synergy can be seen. These factors were based on factors that get strong support from stakeholders. The factors that received strong support from stakeholder actors were: responsibility (v4), strategic vision (v1), capacity (v2) and mindset (v3 ). The responsibility factor (v4) received a strong contribution from 7 stakeholders, the strategic vision factor (v1)  received strong support from 6 stakeholders, the capacity factor (v2) received a strong contribution from 5 stakeholders, and the mindset factor (v3) received moderate support from 3 stakeholders.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021): Khazanah Sosial Vol 3, No 3 November 2021
Section
Articles

Copyright and License

Authors who publish with Khazanah Sosial agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant Khazanah Sosial the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits others to share the work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and the original publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.

  2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of their work, such as depositing it in an institutional repository or including it in a book, provided that its initial publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to share their work online, including through institutional repositories and personal websites, before and during the submission process. Such sharing may facilitate scholarly exchange and increase the visibility and citation of published work. For further information, see The Effect of Open Access.

References

Anantanyu, S. (2011). Kelembagaan petani: peran dan strategi pengembangan kapasitasnya. SEPA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 7(2).

Fallon, F. (2001). Conflict, power and tourism on Lombok. Current Issues in Tourism, 4(6), 481–502.

Farhan, H., & Anwar, K. (2016). The tourism development strategy based on rural and local wisdom. Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(3), 170–181.

Farsari, I., Butler, R. W., & Szivas, E. (2011). Complexity in tourism policies: A cognitive mapping approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 1110–1134.

Fauzi, A. (2019). Teknik Keberlanjutan. Gramedia.

Harmes-Liedtke, U., & Mannocchi, L. (2012). Complexities of tourism development-Viewpoints of development practitioner. P3T, Public Policies and Territory, 1(3), 9.

Hawkins, D. S., Budi, D. N. P. R., Shafira, A. B., & Abbas, R. J. (2022). Sustainable tourism and environmental degradation in the Rin-jani-Lombok Unesco Global Geopark. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Advances in Pure and Applied Sciences, 14, 38–50.

Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1995). Globalization and the future of the nation state. Economy and Society, 24(3), 408–442.

Kusuma, D. W. (2020). Institutional Capacity Development of Rural Tourism In Lombok Kulon Bondowoso. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 1(1), 47–53.

McKercher, B. (1999). A chaos approach to tourism. Tourism Management, 20(4), 425–434.

Minnaert, L., Maitland, R., & Miller, G. (2009). Tourism and social policy: The value of social tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(2), 316–334.

Pratama, R. (2017). Analisis Pemetaan Jejaring Stakeholder Pariwisata Di Kota Batu Dengan Menggunakan Metode Social Network Analysis (SNA). Universitas Brawijaya.

Stokes, R. (2008). Tourism strategy making: Insights to the events tourism domain. Tourism Management, 29(2), 252–262.

Sumardjan, S., & Soemardi, S. (1964). Setangkai Bunga Sosiologi. FEUI.

Sunaryo, B. (2013). Kebijakan pembangunan destinasi pariwisata: konsep dan aplikasinya di Indonesia. Gava Media.

Triambodo, S. (2015). Analisis Strategi Penguatan Kelembagaan Desa Wisata Berbasis Ekonomi Kreatif (Studi di Desa Wisata Kerajinan Tenun Dusun Gamplong, Desa Sumberrahayu, Kecamatan Moyudan, Kabupaten Sleman, DIY). Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Wildan, W., Sukardi, S., & Syuaeb, M. Z. (2016). The feasibility of development of social capital-based ecotourism in West Lombok. Mimbar: Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 32(1), 214–222.