The Waning of Kiai's Role: Transformation from Cultural Broker to Political Broker in Regional Head Election

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Apr 29, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v5i2.25326
Keywords:
Cultural broker, Kiai, political broker, Regional Head Election

Main Article Content

Muslim Mufti
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the transformation of the role of Kiai in the local political context, focusing on their role as cultural broker to become political broker in Banten Regional Head Election. This research involved a qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with Kiai in the Banten area and an analysis of related documents. The study's results found a change in the role of the Kiai from being a cultural broker responsible for spreading religious and cultural teachings to the public into a political broker involved in the political process and regional head elections. Kiai not only acts as spiritual leaders but also become determinants in the local political process, including in the regional head elections. Kyai uses their religious influence and authority to influence political preferences and voter behavior. They also have access to political networks and play a role in coordinating political support for certain regional head candidates. This research provides a better understanding of the transformation of Kiai's role from a cultural broker to a political broker in the political process. This study implies that it is a basis for developing a comprehensive understanding of local political dynamics in Indonesia and the role of religion in the political process.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Khazanah Sosial
Section
Articles

Copyright and License

Authors who publish with Khazanah Sosial agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant Khazanah Sosial the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits others to share the work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and the original publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.

  2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of their work, such as depositing it in an institutional repository or including it in a book, provided that its initial publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to share their work online, including through institutional repositories and personal websites, before and during the submission process. Such sharing may facilitate scholarly exchange and increase the visibility and citation of published work. For further information, see The Effect of Open Access.

References

Ambardi. (2009). Mengungkap Politik Kartel: Studi tentang Sistem Kepartaian di Indonesia Era Reformasi. Jakarta: PT.Gramedia.

Aziz, A. (n.d.). Risalah Singkat Pilgub Banten 2011-2016.

Barcson, B. S. (2015). Electoral politics and patron-client relations: The impediment to electoral development in PNG. Contemporary PNG Studies, 22, 76–91.

Elefson, T. P. (2009). Transactions for blessing (baraka): An ethnography of socio-religio-political power among men in the Santri Islam region of Java. Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Intercultural Studies.

Faridl, M. (2003). Peran Sosial Politik Kiai di Indonesia. Mimbar, 19(2), 195–202.

Fauzi, M. L. (2012). Traditional Islam in Javanese society: The roles of kyai and pesantren in preserving Islamic tradition and negotiating modernity. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 6(1), 125–144.

Flynn, F. J., & Staw, B. M. (2004). Lend me your wallets: the effect of charismatic leadership on external support for an organization. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.377

Gardner, W. L., & Avolio, B. J. (1998). The Charismatic Relationship: A Dramaturgical Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.192958

Geertz, C. (1957). Ritual and social change: a Javanese example. American Anthropologist, 59(1), 32–54.

Geertz, C. (1960). The Religion of Java. London: The University of Chicago Press.

Gendron, A. (2017). The Call to Jihad: Charismatic Preachers and the Internet. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 40(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2016.1157406

Halim, W. (2018). Young Islamic preachers on Facebook: Pesantren As’adiyah and its engagement with social media. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(134), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2018.1416796

Hasan, N. (2008). The Salafi Madrasas of Indonesia. In F. A. Noor, Y. Sikand, & M. van Bruinessen (Eds.), The Madrasa in Asia: Political Activism and Transnational Linkages. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Hidayaturrahman, M., & Putra, D. . A. (2019). The Role of Technology and Social Media in Spreading the Qur’an and Hadiths by Mubalig. DINIKA : Academic Journal of Islamic Studies, 4(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.22515/dinika.v4i1.1858

Hinnebusch, R. A. (1984). Charisma, revolution, and state formation: Qaddafi and Libya. Third World Quarterly, 6(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436598408419755

Hodgson, M. G. S. (1974). The Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Horikoshi, H. (1987). Kyai dan Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta: P3M.

Hudaeri, M. (2011). Tasbih dan Golok, Kedudukan, Peran dan Jaringan Kiyai dan Jawara di Banten. Banten: Biro Humas dan Protokol Setda Provinsi Banten.

Magenda, B. D. (1990). Perubahan dan Keseimbangan dalam perubahan Masyarakat Indonesia. Prisma, 4, 6–7.

Maswardi Rauf. (2009). Evaluasi Sistem Presidensial. In M. Nurhasim & I. N. Bhakti (Eds.), Sistem Presidensial dan Sosok Presiden Ideal. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Noer, D. (1987). Partai Islam di Pentas Nasional, 1945-1965. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Nurmajah, S. (2020). Kitab Suci dan Politik Banten: Identifikasi Regionalatas Al- Qur’an Mushaf Al -Bantani. Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sunan Pandanaran.

Pelras, C. (2000). Patron-client ties among the Bugis and Makassarese of South Sulawesi. In Authority and Enterprise (pp. 15–54). Leiden: BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004486409_003

Pendidikan Islam Kementerian Agama. (2011). Gubernur Banten Serahkan Hibah Rp 2,5 M Bagi Pesantren. Retrieved 21 December 2020, from Pendidikan Islam Kementerian Agama website: https://pendis.kemenag.go.id/read/gubernur-banten-serahkan-hibah-rp-25-m-bagi-pesantren

Qodim, H. (2023). Preserving Faith and Tradition: The Role of Traditional Leaders and Mosques in the Socio-Religious Life of Coastal Communities. Khazanah Sosial, 5(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v5i1.24502

Ricklefs, M. C. (2005). Sejarah Indonesia Modern 1200-2004 (S. Wahono, B. Bilfagih, H. Huda, M. Helmi, J. Sutrisno, & H. Manadi, Trans.). Jakarta: PT. Serambi Ilmu Semesta.

Rohmatulloh, D. M., As’ad, M., & Malayati, R. M. (2022). Gus Baha, Santri Gayeng, and The Rise of Traditionalist Preachers on Social Media. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 16(2), 303. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2022.16.2.303-325

Roslan Mohd Nor, M., & Malim, M. (2014). Revisiting Islamic education: the case of Indonesia. Journal for Multicultural Education, 8(4), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-05-2014-0019

Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959280

Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443–466). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Syari’ati, A. (1983). Islam Dalam Persfektif Sosiologi Agama. Bandung: Iqra.

Thahir, M. (2014). The role and function of Islamic boarding school: An Indonesian context. Tawarikh: International Journal for Historical Studies, 5(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.2121/tawarikh.v5i2.574

Thotkhah, I. (2001). Anatomi Konflik Politik di Indonesia: Belajar dari Ketegangan Politik Varian di Madukoro. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Toloie-Eshlaghy, A., Chitsaz, S., Karimian, L., & Charkhchi, R. (2011). A classification of qualitative research methods. Research Journal of International Studies, 20(20), 106–123.

Trigg, J. W. (1981). The Charismatic Intellectual: Origen’s Understanding of Religious Leadership. Church History, 50(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/3166476

Turmudi, E. (2004). Perselingkuhan kiai dan kekuasaan. Yogyakarta: PT LKiS Pelangi Aksara.

Turner, B. S. (2007). Religious Authority and the New Media. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075001

Wiryawan, M. R., & Nurdin, D. (2022). Managing Islamic Education for University Studentsin Digital Era. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Research of Educational Administration AndManagement (ICREAM 2022), 48–53.

Woodward, M. R. (1989). Islam in Java: Normative Piety and Mysticism in the Sultanate of Yogyakarta. USA: The University of Arizona Press.

Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 5(1), 1–6.

Zulkifli, Z. (2013). The Ulama in Indonesia: Between Religious Authority and Symbolic Power. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v37i1.79