Dominant Position in the Aviation Industry: Case Analysis of Appointment of Strategic Business Partners (Wholesaler) By PT.Garuda Perspective UU No. 5 of 1999

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Oct 12, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v5i3.29520
Keywords:
Dominant position, Market control, Wholesaler., PT. Garuda Indonesia

Main Article Content

Abdullah Taufik
Fakultas Syari’ah IAIN Kediri

Abstract

In 2019, PT. Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. introduced the Indonesian Jiddah flight route for Umrah services, employing a wholesaler mechanism through the appointment of strategic business partners. This exclusive arrangement limited Umrah ticket reservations to specific partners and raised concerns about PT. Garuda's potential dominance in the market, which could lead to violations of business competition laws. The aim of this research is to analyze PT. Garuda's behavior in appointing these strategic partners and assess its potential for abusing its dominant position. Additionally, it examines the authority of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in addressing allegations of PT. Garuda's abuse of its dominant position and explores the broader implications of such abuse on market competition. This study employs a normative juridical approach, scrutinizing relevant statutory regulations and adopting both statutory and case approaches to provide insights into the market concentration and its potential impact on competition.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Khazanah Sosial
Section
Articles

Copyright and License

Authors who publish with Khazanah Sosial agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant Khazanah Sosial the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits others to share the work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and the original publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.

  2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of their work, such as depositing it in an institutional repository or including it in a book, provided that its initial publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to share their work online, including through institutional repositories and personal websites, before and during the submission process. Such sharing may facilitate scholarly exchange and increase the visibility and citation of published work. For further information, see The Effect of Open Access.

References

Ahyani, H., Putra, H. M., Slamet, M., & Mutmainah, N. (2022). Standardization of Companies and The Islamic Business Environment in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(1), 10–20.

Akyuwen, R. (2011). The impact of restructuring on the airline performance: The Case of Garuda Indonesia. Communication Today, I, 112–133.

Gunawan, T. (2016). Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Terlarang dalam Hukum Positif menurut UU No. 5 Tahun 1999. Lex Crimen, 5(6).

Hasbullah, M. A. (2021). Perdebatan Definisi dan Kriteria Posisi Dominan dalam Perspektif Regulasi dan Ekonomi. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(1), 1–13.

Idris, Z. (2019). Tinjauan HPU Indonesia dari Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 4(1).

Kangramanto, L. B. (2008). Mengenal Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Berdasarkan UU No. 5 5 Tahun 1999). In Laros, Surabaya. Laros,.

KPPU. (1999). pasal.6 UU No. 5 Tahun 1999. KPPU.

Makka, Z. (2021). Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Pelaku Usaha Pesaing terhadap Posisi Dominan dalam Penerapan Rule of Reason. Jurnal Persaingan Usaha, 1(2), 5–14.

Maulidiana, L., & Renaldy, R. (2020). Kepemilikan Saham Tanpa Batas Pada Grup Perusahaan Yang Berakibat Munculnya Posisi Dominan. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5(2), 256–270.

Rahayu, D. P. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media.

Setyawati, R., & Pradana, R. A. (2022). Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Oleh Pelaku Usaha Dominan Melalui Penggunaan Algoritma Harga. UIR Law Review, 6(2), 103–120.

Shirazi, N. S. (2006). Providing for The Resource Shortfall for Proverty Elemination Through The Institution of Zakah in Low Income Muslim Countries. Journal of Economics and Management.

Simbolon, A. (2013). Pendekatan yang dilakukan komisi pengawas persaingan usaha menentukan pelanggaran dalam hukum persaingan usaha. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 20(2), 186–206.

Taqyuddin, A. I., & Anggraini, A. M. T. (2022). Praktik Diskriminasi PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Terkait Program Wholesaler. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 4(1), 21–32.

Usaman, R. (2013). Hukum Persaingan Usaha Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Wherry, F. F. (2012). The culture of markets. Polity.

Widhiyanti, H. N. (2022). Bayang-Bayang Kartel dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Wulandari, I., & Ibrahim, R. (2013). Analisis Kewenangan KPPU Melakukan Penyelidikan Dan/Atau Pemeriksaan Yang Diatur Dalam Pasal 36 UU No. 5 Tahun 1999. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 1–14.

Yamey, B. (1974). Monopolistic price discrimination and economic welfare. The Journal of Law and Economics, 17(2), 377–380.