Strategic Integration of Policy and Logistics: A Case Study of Copenhagen’s Model for Sustainable Urban Supply Chains

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Nov 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v6i3.39508
Keywords:
Urban Supply Chain, Policy Integration, Sustainable Logistics, Digital Technology.

Main Article Content

Luluk Fauziah
Sekolah Vokasi Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
Mashudi Mashudi
Sekolah Vokasi Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
Tri Yuniningsih
Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

Abstract

This study explores integrating logistics policies and practices in creating efficient and sustainable urban supply chains. The study analyzes how green transport policies, the use of digital technologies, and collaboration between government and the private sector contribute to improving logistics efficiency and reducing emissions through a qualitative approach with thematic interviews with stakeholders and a case study of Copenhagen. Copenhagen has successfully implemented low-emission zones and an intelligent traffic management system that optimizes delivery routes, thereby reducing congestion and increasing sustainability. The findings provide important insights for other cities, including Jakarta, that face similar challenges in the logistics sector. The study suggests that implementing an effective policy integration model can help address environmental and operational issues, as well as improve the quality of life for urban residents. The results of this study contribute to the literature on urban logistics and sustainability policies and offer strategic recommendations for policymakers.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): Khazanah Sosial
Section
Articles

Copyright and License

Authors who publish with Khazanah Sosial agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant Khazanah Sosial the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits others to share the work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and the original publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.

  2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of their work, such as depositing it in an institutional repository or including it in a book, provided that its initial publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to share their work online, including through institutional repositories and personal websites, before and during the submission process. Such sharing may facilitate scholarly exchange and increase the visibility and citation of published work. For further information, see The Effect of Open Access.

References

Akinsulire, A. A., Idemudia, C., Okwandu, A. C., & Iwuanyanwu, O. (2024). Supply chain management and operational efficiency in affordable housing: An integrated review. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 11(2), 105–118.

Bosona, T. (2020). Urban freight last mile logistics—Challenges and opportunities to improve sustainability: A literature review. Sustainability, 12(21), 8769.

Chhetri, P., Nkhoma, M., Peszynski, K., Chhetri, A., & Lee, P. T.-W. (2018). Global logistics city concept: a cluster-led strategy under the belt and road initiative. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(3), 319–335.

Esan, O., Ajayi, F. A., & Olawale, O. (2024). Supply chain integrating sustainability and ethics: Strategies for modern supply chain management. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 22(1), 1930–1953.

Fan, J., Mehmood, S., Hussain, I., Nazir, S., & Basit, A. (2023). Transport infrastructure environmental performance: the role of stakeholders, technological integration, government policies and lean supply chain management. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1322466.

Grant, D. B., Wong, C. Y., & Trautrims, A. (2017). Sustainable logistics and supply chain management: principles and practices for sustainable operations and management. Kogan Page Publishers.

Halldórsson, Ã., & Kovács, G. (2010). The sustainable agenda and energy efficiency: Logistics solutions and supply chains in times of climate change. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(1/2), 5–13.

Heliantina, F., Maksum, I. R., & Prasetyo, U. E. (2024). Evaluation Of Policy Integration In The Urban-Rural Logistics System: Analysis Of The National Logistics System In Indonesia. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 4(6).

Hu, W., Dong, J., Hwang, B., Ren, R., & Chen, Z. (2019). A scientometrics review on city logistics literature: Research trends, advanced theory and practice. Sustainability, 11(10), 2724.

Issa Zadeh, S. B., & Garay-Rondero, C. L. (2023). Enhancing Urban Sustainability: Unravelling Carbon Footprint Reduction in Smart Cities through Modern Supply-Chain Measures. Smart Cities, 6(6), 3225–3250.

Kumar, N., Brint, A., Shi, E., Upadhyay, A., & Ruan, X. (2019). Integrating sustainable supply chain practices with operational performance: an exploratory study of Chinese SMEs. Production Planning & Control, 30(5–6), 464–478.

Laguir, I., Stekelorum, R., & El Baz, J. (2021). Going green? Investigating the relationships between proactive environmental strategy, GSCM practices and performances of third-party logistics providers (TPLs). Production Planning & Control, 32(13), 1049–1062.

Letnik, T., Marksel, M., Luppino, G., Bardi, A., & BožiÄnik, S. (2018). Review of policies and measures for sustainable and energy efficient urban transport. Energy, 163, 245–257.

Li, Q., Yan, R., Zhang, L., & Yan, B. (2022). Empirical study on improving international dry port competitiveness based on logistics supply chain integration: evidence from China. The International

Journal of Logistics Management, 33(3), 1040–1068.

Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A. (2020). Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920937875.

Mazzarino, M., & Rubini, L. (2019). Smart urban planning: Evaluating urban logistics performance of innovative solutions and sustainable policies in the Venice Lagoon—The results of a case study. Sustainability, 11(17), 4580.

Mirzabeiki, V., He, Q., & Sarpong, D. (2023). Sustainability-driven co-opetition in supply chains as strategic capabilities: drivers, facilitators, and barriers. International Journal of Production Research, 61(14), 4826–4852.

Montoya-Torres, J. R., Muñoz-Villamizar, A., & Vega-Mejía, C. A. (2016a). On the impact of collaborative strategies for goods delivery in city logistics. Production Planning & Control, 27(6), 443–455.

Montoya-Torres, J. R., Muñoz-Villamizar, A., & Vega-Mejía, C. A. (2016b). On the impact of collaborative strategies for goods delivery in city logistics. Production Planning & Control, 27(6), 443–455.

Notteboom, T., & Neyens, K. (2017). The future of port logistics: meeting the challenges of supply chain integration. Bruselas: ING Bannk.

Peterson, J. S. (2019). Presenting a qualitative study: A reviewer’s perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 147–158.

Qi, Y., Huo, B., Wang, Z., & Yeung, H. Y. J. (2017). The impact of operations and supply chain strategies on integration and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 185, 162–174.

Rajabion, L., Khorraminia, M., Andjomshoaa, A., Ghafouri-Azar, M., & Molavi, H. (2019). A new model for assessing the impact of the urban intelligent transportation system, farmers’ knowledge and business processes on the success of green supply chain management system for urban distribution of agricultural products. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 154–162.

Rossi, S., Colicchia, C., Cozzolino, A., & Christopher, M. (2013). The logistics service providers in eco-efficiency innovation: an empirical study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(6), 583–603.

Salmona, M., & Kaczynski, D. (2024). Qualitative data analysis strategies. In How to Conduct Qualitative Research in Finance (pp. 80–96). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2014). Measuring and managing sustainability performance of supply chains: Review and sustainability supply chain management framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 232–241.

Sehnem, S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Pereira, S. C. F., & de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. (2019). Improving sustainable supply chains performance through operational excellence: circular economy approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, 236–248.

Tasche, L., Bähring, M., & Gerlach, B. (2023). Digital Supply Chain Twins in Urban Logistics System–Conception of an Integrative Platform. TehniÄki Glasnik, 17(3), 405–413.

Uzun, F., & Ergül, M. Y. (2024). The Role of Logistics in Sustainable Cities and Communities. In Effective Logistics for Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 126–144). IGI Global.

Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2007). Supply chain management and environmental technologies: the role of integration. International Journal of Production Research, 45(2), 401–423.

Van Engeland, J., Beliën, J., De Boeck, L., & De Jaeger, S. (2020). Literature review: Strategic network optimization models in waste reverse supply chains. Omega, 91, 102012.

Wei, Q., Gou, X., & Zhang, B. (2024). Urban Sharing Logistics Strategies against Epidemic Outbreaks: Its Feasibility and Sustainability. Sustainability, 16(17), 7628.

Xia, W., Li, B., & Yin, S. (2020). A prescription for urban sustainability transitions in China: Innovative partner selection management of green building materials industry in an integrated supply chain. Sustainability, 12(7), 2581.

Xu, Q., Hu, Q., Chin, T., Chen, C., Shi, Y., & Xu, J. (2019). How supply chain integration affects innovation in a digital age: Moderating effects of sustainable policy. Sustainability, 11(19), 5460.