Gender Perspective of Planners as a Gender Focal Point in the Provincial Government of Central Sulawesi

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 31, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v6i4.44357
Keywords:
Gender Perspective, Gender Mainstreaming, Social Construction, Regional Development Planning, Policy Implementation, Central Sulawesi, Gender Focal Point, Public Sector Planning.

Main Article Content

Irmawati Sahi
Tadulako University
Muhammad Khairil
Tadulako University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5192-6554
Ritha Safitri
Tadulako University

Abstract

This study examines the gender perspective of planners in regional apparatus organizations (OPD) within the Central Sulawesi Provincial Government, focusing on their roles as gender focal points in development planning. Using Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann’s (1966) Social Construction Theory—comprising externalization, objectification, and internalization—this qualitative research, conducted from September 2024 to February 2025, employs purposive sampling to select informants from key OPDs involved in gender-based planning, including the Regional Development Planning Agency, the Inspectorate, the Women’s Empowerment and Child Protection Office, the Education Office, the Population Control and Family Planning Office, and the Central Sulawesi Social Service. Primary data will be collected through in-depth interviews and direct observations of gender mainstreaming (PUG) activities, while secondary data will be sourced from government policies, academic articles, official websites, and books. Data analysis follows the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldana (2014), which includes data collection, data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that OPD planners generally exhibit biases in their approach to gender mainstreaming (PUG), where the externalization stage shows varied understandings of PUG alongside efforts to promote gender-responsive development planning, the objectification stage reflects critical perspectives on gender-responsive policies in infrastructure, education, and health, and the internalization stage highlights challenges in fully integrating gender considerations into regional development planning. This study emphasizes the need for capacity-building programs to strengthen planners’ gender perspectives and recommends greater institutional support for sustainable gender mainstreaming in regional governance.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): Khazanah Sosial
Section
Articles

Copyright and License

Authors who publish with Khazanah Sosial agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant Khazanah Sosial the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits others to share the work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and the original publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.

  2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of their work, such as depositing it in an institutional repository or including it in a book, provided that its initial publication in Khazanah Sosial is acknowledged.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to share their work online, including through institutional repositories and personal websites, before and during the submission process. Such sharing may facilitate scholarly exchange and increase the visibility and citation of published work. For further information, see The Effect of Open Access.

Author Biographies

Irmawati Sahi, Tadulako University

Social Sciences Study Program, Tadulako University Postgraduate Doctoral Program

Muhammad Khairil, Tadulako University

Professor of Social Sciences and Political Sciences Faculty Tadulako University

Ritha Safitri, Tadulako University

Lecturer of Social Sciences and Political Sciences Faculty Tadulako University

References

Aditya, B. J. (2016). Menjadi sintas: Tindakan dan upaya pencegahan dan pemulihan kekerasan seksual. Jurnal Perempuan, 21(2), 143–154. https://www.indonesianfeministjournal.org/index.php/IFJ/article/view/92/93

Allolayuk, A. (2021). Menyingkap sisi gelap pendidikan sebagai arena reproduksi kesenjangan sosial berdasarkan perspektif Pierre Bourdieu. Syntax Idea, 3(8), 1802–1813.

Balkis, A. H. (2020). Gaya kepemimpinan perempuan dalam instansi publik: Studi pada kepemimpinan Susi Pudjiastuti. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara (JUAN), 8(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.31629/juan.v8i1.2271

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2023). Statistik Indonesia 2023. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2020/04/29/e9011b3155d45d70823c141f/statistik-indonesia-2020.html

Dharma, F. A. (2018). Konstruksi realitas sosial: Pemikiran Peter L. Berger tentang kenyataan sosial. Review Paper, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21070/kanal.v

Fitriliana, F., Nelliraharti, N., Suri, M., & Kesumawati, K. (2023). Perlindungan terhadap kekerasan seksual di lingkungan sekolah (SMKN 1 Sabang). Journal of Law and Government Science, 9(1), 11–15.

Hendrik, Jamaluddin, I. I., & Septiana, A. R. (2024). Sumber daya dalam penanganan anak korban kekerasan seksual pada Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Kabupaten Kolaka Sulawesi Tenggara. Morality: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.52947/morality.v10i1.421

Horton, P. B., & Hunt, C. L. (1996). Sosiologi Jilid 1 (terjemahan). Erlangga.

Israpil, I. (2017). Budaya patriarki dan kekerasan terhadap perempuan (Sejarah dan perkembangannya). Pusaka, 5(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.31969/pusaka.v5i2.176

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia (KemenPAN-RB). (2023). Kesenjangan gender dalam birokrasi masih jadi masalah. Menpan.Go.Id. https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/berita-daerah/kesenjangan-gender-dalam-birokrasi-masih-jadi-masalah

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Madsen, W., & Andrade, C. (2022). Gender-responsive budgeting: Challenges and opportunities for equitable policy implementation. Public Administration and Development, 42(1), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2009

Mukhopadhyay, M., & Eyben, R. (2021). Gender mainstreaming in development policy: Problems and possibilities. Third World Quarterly, 42(7), 1349-1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1958124

Nazneen, S., & Hickey, S. (2023). The political economy of gender reforms: Why women’s leadership matters. World Development, 167(1), 105-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.105128

Rahmatunnisa, M., Solihah, R., & Ghufroni, F. (2022). Kepemimpinan kepala daerah dalam mewujudkan pengarusutamaan gender di Kabupaten Brebes. JANE (Jurnal Administrasi Negara), 13(2), 319–330.

Safitri, R. (2023). Hubungan gender di parlemen (E. R. Fadillah, Ed.). Deepublish.

Sulaiman, A. (2016). Memahami teori konstruksi sosial Peter L. Berger. Jurnal Society, 6(1), 15–22.

Stratigaki, M. (2005). Gender mainstreaming vs positive action: An ongoing conflict in EU gender equality policy. European Journal of Women's Studies, 12(2), 165-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506805051236

True, J., & Parisi, L. (2023). Mainstreaming gender in global governance: Institutions, policies, and challenges. International Studies Review, 25(4), 563-582. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viad032

Wartoyo, F. X., & Ginting, Y. P. (2023). Kekerasan seksual pada lingkungan perguruan tinggi ditinjau dari nilai Pancasila. Jurnal Lemhannas RI, 11(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v11i1.423