Examining the Dual Effects of Incentive Type and Distribution Timing on Employee Performance in Indonesian Corporate Settings

Examining the Dual Effects of Incentive Type and Distribution Timing on Employee Performance in Indonesian Corporate Settings

Authors

  • Hartanto Halim Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) Cirebon
  • Eman Sulaiman Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) Cirebon
  • Ellin Herlina Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) Cirebon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v8i1.39960

Keywords:

Incentive Design, Monetary Rewards, Reward Timing, Employee Motivation, Human Resource Management

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and compare the effectiveness of incentive schemes based on their type (monetary vs. non-monetary) and timing of distribution (monthly vs. quarterly) in enhancing employee performance. The research is motivated by the recurring challenge that poorly designed incentive systems often fail to motivate employees and may even trigger dissatisfaction and turnover. Using a quantitative approach, the study employed a Likert-scale questionnaire that was validated and proven reliable (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.872). The sample comprised 50 employees of Company X in Jakarta selected through purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple linear regression to identify the relative effects of each factor. The results show that monetary incentives are perceived as significantly more effective than non-monetary ones in improving motivation and productivity (β = 0.440; p < 0.001). Likewise, the timeliness of incentive distribution—particularly when provided within one month after achieving the target—has a positive and significant impact on performance (β = 0.325; p = 0.005). The regression model demonstrates that the combination of monetary incentives and monthly distribution yields the strongest performance enhancement, explaining 51.5% of performance variation (R² = 0.515). These findings confirm that both the form and timing of rewards act as complementary drivers of employee commitment and effort. Practically, the study underscores the importance of integrated incentive design that balances financial and non-financial elements, ensures timely delivery, and maintains transparency to reinforce perceptions of fairness and trust. Theoretically, it contributes to strategic human resource management by contextualizing expectancy theory and equity theory within the Indonesian corporate setting. The originality of this study lies in its dual-dimensional analysis of incentive type and timing, a combination rarely examined simultaneously in prior HRM research in Indonesia.

References

Abdin, F., Ismail, A., & Muhamad, N. S. (2019). Relationship between distributive fairness in remuneration systems and organizational affective commitment with trust in supervisors as mediator. International Journal of Business and Management Science, 9(3), 425–445.

Adams, J. S. (1976). Equity theory revisited: Comments and annotated bibliography. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 43–90.

Agustini, P., Wardhani, R. A. D. A., Gustia, R., Perdana, Y., & Selawati, S. (2022). Peran Sumber Daya manusia Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan ODP Sekertariat DPRD Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbankan Syariah (JIMPA), 2(1), 113–122.

Al Shibly, M. S., & Bakir, S. M. ’A. (2023). The Impact of Organizational Justice on Organizational Trust: Examining the Moderating Role of Job Security: A Study at the Jordanian Insurance Companies. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 621 LNNS, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26956-1_1

Alkandi, I. G., Khan, M. A., Fallatah, M., Alabdulhadi, A., Alanizan, S., & Alharbi, J. (2023). The impact of incentive and reward systems on employee performance in the Saudi primary, secondary, and tertiary industrial sectors: A mediating influence of employee job satisfaction. Sustainability, 15(4), 3415.

Allen, A. (2012). Life without the ‘X’ Factor: Meritocracy Past and Present. Power and Education, 4(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.2304/power.2012.4.1.4

Amillano, A., Baniandrés, J., & Gartzia, L. (2020). Integral human development through servant leadership and psychological androgyny. In Contributions to Management Science (pp. 57–75). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29426-7_4

Andersen, L. B., & Pallesen, T. (2008). “Not just for the money?” How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish Research Institutions. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887889

Anthonie, M. V., Tumbel, T. M., & Sambul, S. A. P. (2021). Pengaruh Insentif Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Karyawan Hotel NDC Resort & SPA Manado. Productivity, 2(1), 21–25.

Bills, D. B. (2019). The problem of meritocracy: the belief in achievement, credentials and justice. In Research Handbook on the Sociology of Education (pp. 88–105). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788110426.00013

Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2012). Incentives, intrinsic motivation, and performance: A metaanalysis and theoretical reconciliation. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 580–585. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2012.128

Cheung, S. O., Wong, P. S. P., & Lam, A. L. (2012). An investigation of the relationship between organizational culture and the performance of construction organizations. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(4), 688–704. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2011.620157

Dastmalchian, A., Bacon, N., McNeil, N., Steinke, C., Blyton, P., Kumar, M. S., Bayraktar, S., Auer-Rizzi, W., Ahmad, A., Craig, T., Isa Ghazali Bin Musa, C. R. B., Habibi, M., Huang, H., Imer, P., Ayman, I., Kabasakal, H., Meo Colombo, C., Moghavami, S., Mukherjee, T., … Varnali, T. N. (2018). High-performance work systems and organizational performance across societal cultures. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.161

Dutta, D., Kumar, K. K., & Mishra, S. K. (2021). Unintended consequences of promotions: Importance of annual incentives for performance management systems. Human Resource Management, 60(5), 787–801.

Dutta, D., & Mishra, S. K. (2021). Chatting with the CEO’s Virtual Assistant: Impact on Climate for Trust, Fairness, Employee Satisfaction, and Engagement. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 13(4), 431–452. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00156

Farhady, H. (2012). The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431

Grant, C., Nawal, D., Guntur, S. M., Kumar, M., Chaudhuri, I., Galavotti, C., Mahapatra, T., Ranjan, K., Kumar, G., Mohanty, S., Alam, M. A., Das, A., & Jiwani, S. (2018). ’We pledge to improve the health of our entire community’: Improving health worker motivation and performance in Bihar, India through teamwork, recognition, and non-financial incentives. PLoS ONE, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203265

Herzberg, F. (2018). Herzberg’s two-factor theory. Bookboon.

Hubbell, A. P., & Chory-Assad, R. M. (2005). Motivating factors: Perceptions of justice and their relationship with managerial and organizational trust. Communication Studies, 56(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0008957042000332241

Jiaojiao, L. (2025). Application of blockchain technology in performance incentive of sports employees: decentralization and trust mechanism. Retos, 67, 1221–1233. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v67.114977

Karisma Zona Kreatifku. (2024). Masalah Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia: Apa Saja & Bagaimana Cara Atasinya? Karisma Zona Kreatifku. https://kazokku.com/blog/2024/11/15/masalah-ketenagakerjaan-di-indonesia/#:~:text=Masalah ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia membutuhkan,ekonomi yang inklusif dan berkelanjutan.

Katou, A. A., & Budhwar, P. S. (2006). Human resource management systems and organizational performance: A test of a mediating model in the Greek manufacturing context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(7), 1223–1253. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190600756525

Khan, M., & Consterdine, P. (2023). Smart personalization: Providing employee benefits for every generation. Mercer. https://www.mercer.com/insights/total-rewards/employee-wellbeing/smart-personalization-providing-employee-benefits-for-every-generation/#:~:text=Data Health on Demand 2023 kami mengungkapkan bahwa 78%25 Generasi,bakat yang penting bagi bisnis.

Kirgios, E. L., Chang, E. H., Levine, E. E., Milkman, K. L., & Kessler, J. B. (2020). Forgoing earned incentives to signal pure motives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(29), 16891–16897. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2000065117

Kunz, J., & Quitmann, A. (2011). The influence of incentive systems on intrinsic motivation. Zeitschrift Fur Personalforschung, 25(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1688/1862-0000_ZfP_2011_01_Kunz

Lee, S., Hong, S., Shin, W.-Y., & Lee, B. G. (2023). The Experiences of Layoff Survivors: Navigating Organizational Justice in Times of Crisis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416717

Lestari, E. R. (2019). Manajemen Inovasi: Upaya Meraih Keunggulan Kompetitif. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Maharani, D., Sudarmi, S., & Parawu, H. E. (2021). Pengaruh Insentif Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di Kantor POS Regional X Makassar. Kajian Ilmiah Mahasiswa Administrasi Publik (KIMAP), 2(1), 17–31.

McAlearney, A. S., Garman, A. N., Song, P. H., McHugh, M., Robbins, J., & Harrison, M. I. (2011). High-performance work systems in health care management, Part 2: Qualitative evidence from five case studies. Health Care Management Review, 36(3), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182100dc4

Melé, D. (2016). Understanding Humanistic Management. Humanistic Management Journal, 1(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-016-0011-5

Miao, Y., & Zhang, W. (2024). Big Data Analysis and Model Construction of the Correlation Between Organizational Culture and Employee Performance. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 11(1), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.33168/JLISS.2024.0127

Miller, L. J. (2019). Meritocracy and the maintenance of order. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research, 8(4), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2019.8.4.76

Mugambwa, J., Mutumba, W. W., Kyambade, M., Kayongo, I. N., & Ogwang, R. (2024). Students Leadership and Humanistic Management Practices in Higher Education Institutions. In Humanism in Business Series: Vol. Part F4271 (pp. 231–260). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73522-6_11

Pavel, S. M. (2024). Merit as a Distributive Justice Principle. In Handbook of Equality of Opportunity (pp. 259–273). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55897-9_93

Pellerano, J. A., Price, M. K., Puller, S. L., & Sánchez, G. E. (2017). Do Extrinsic Incentives Undermine Social Norms? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Energy Conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 67(3), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0094-3

Pérez-Arechaederra, D., Briones, E., & García-Ortiz, L. (2025). Communication and relationships: how patients perceive informational and interactional organizational justice can improve patient-centered care, a study with samples from Spain and the U.S. BMC Health Services Research, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12461-x

Pirson, M., & Kostera, M. (2017). Introduction to Dignity and Organization. In Humanism in Business Series: Vol. Part F4232 (pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55562-5_1

Prihatini, P., Putri, A. A. S., & Paningrum, D. (2022). Pengaruh Insentif, Fasilitas Kerja, Dan Pengembangan Karir Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Hotel Sahid Jaya di Surakarta. JURNAL EKONOMI BISNIS DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN, 11(1), 21–32.

Rabey, G. P. (2006). Response to uncertainty. Team Performance Management, 12(3–4), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590610674086

rctiplus.com. (2023). Mercer Global Talent Trends Study 2023: Perusahaan Indonesia Perlu Tingkatkan Aspek Fleksibilitas Kerja dan Kesejahteraan Karyawan. Rctiplus.Com. https://www.rctiplus.com/news/detail/buddyku/3763420/mercer-global-talent-trends-study-2023--perusahaan-indonesia-perlu-tingkatkan-aspek-fleksibilitas-kerja-dan-kesejahteraan-karyawan

Saini, M., Uppal, N., & Howard, J. L. (2025). Perceived financial incentive salience and its undermining effect: A moderated-mediation model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 98(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70000

Saptati, R. (2024). Ekonomi Indonesia Resilien di Tengah Ketidakpastian Global. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. https://mediakeuangan.kemenkeu.go.id/article/show/ekonomi-indonesia-resilien-di-tengah-ketidakpastian-global#:~:text=Pada 2024%2C aktivitas ekonomi global,rendah dibanding periode sebelum pandemi.

Shalikhah, R., & Indartono, S. (2018). Pengaruh Insentif Dan Komitmen Karyawan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Nasmoco Bahana Motor Yogyakarta. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Indonesia, 7(2), 219–230.

Sousa-Lima, M., Michel, J. W., & Caetano, A. (2013). Clarifying the importance of trust in organizations as a component of effective work relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(2), 418–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2013.01012.x

Subiyantoro, H., & Suhariadi, F. (2025). Sharia Compensation Schemes and Employee Performance in Contemporary Islamic Economics. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(2), 1128–1151. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11192

Tarigan, J., Cahya, J., Valentine, A., Hatane, S., & Jie, F. (2022). Total reward system, job satisfaction and employee productivity on company financial performance: evidence from Indonesian Generation Z workers. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 16(6), 1041–1065.

Thneibat, M., Al Hasan, R., Radaelli, G., & Abu-Arja, A. (2025). Rewards, Performance Appraisal, and Innovative Work Behaviour: A Multi-Mediation Model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 34(3), 682–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12662

Udin, U. (2023). LINKING TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP TO ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING CULTURE AND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATION-MODERATION MODEL. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i3.1229

Ukolov, V. F., Solomatin, A. V, Solomatin, Y. V, & Ukolov, A. V. (2016). Organizational justice: Typology, methodology of research and the methods of development at an enterprise. Social Sciences (Pakistan), 11(15), 3778–3782. https://doi.org/10.3923/sscience.2016.3778.3782

van Triest, S. (2024). Incentives and effort in the public and private sector. Public Administration Review, 84(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13691

Vázquez-Maguirre, M. (2021). Humanistic management in Latin America: Final remarks. In Humanistic Management in Latin America (pp. 189–193). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429351174-13

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.

Wei, Z., Xiang, G., & Ma, X. (2012). Innovation culture, transformational capability and transformational performance: An empirical study of SMEs in China. 2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology, ISMOT 2012, 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679427

World Economic Forum. (2024). The Future of Jobs in South-Eastern Asia: upskilling dominates as technology and geoeconomic uncertainty change talent landscape. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/05/the-future-of-jobs-in-south-eastern-asia-upskilling-dominates-as-technology-and-geoeconomic-uncertainty-change-talent-landscape/

Xenikou, A., & Simosi, M. (2006). Organizational culture and transformational leadership as predictors of business unit performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(6), 566–579. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610684409

Yating, L., bin Arshad, M. A., & Mengjiao, Z. (2024). A review of the impact of motivational factors on employee performance. International Journal of Academic Reserach in Economics and Management Sciences, 13(1).

Zhang, T. (2024). The illusion of meritocracy. Social Science Information, 63(1), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184241230406

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27
Loading...