Pladu Tradition and Technocratic Regulation: Toward Collaborative Governance in Brantas River Dam Flushing Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v8i2.54283Keywords:
Brantas River, Collaborative Governance, Dam Flushing, Pladu Tradition, Technocratic RegulationAbstract
This study analyzes the political sociology of power relations between technocratic state regulation and grassroots community autonomy in the context of the annual dam flushing policy along the Brantas River, East Java, Indonesia. Focusing on the traditional “Pladu” mass fish-catching practice, the research explores how riparian communities actively resist and negotiate centralized hydrological policies that prioritize infrastructure efficiency and securitization while marginalizing local socio-economic realities. Adopting a qualitative case study design, the researcher conducted non-participant observations during flushing events, semi-structured in-depth interviews with dam managers, government officials, village youth leaders, and fishermen, alongside analysis of official documents and digital community interactions. The data were examined through an interactive analytical model with triangulation for validity. The qualitative data were further quantified into intensity scales and visualized through thematic heatmap and network analysis using Python with Seaborn and NetworkX libraries. The findings reveal a profound contestation in which the state's rigid technocratic and securitized approach repeatedly fails to contain civil society's robust agency. Communities demonstrate sophisticated autonomy by decentralizing information via digital networks, self-organizing fishing zones, managing informal parking retribution for communal welfare, and implementing effective peer-based safety and conflict resolution mechanisms. These informal governance practices often prove more legitimate and functional than formal bureaucratic instruments, highlighting the erosion of state coercive authority at the local level and the emergence of an informal "shadow" social order. Drawing on Ansell and Gash's collaborative governance framework, the study argues that the long-dominant centralized technocratic paradigm has reached obsolescence. A genuine shift toward collaborative governance—through inclusive forums that integrate hydrological expertise with local social wisdom and recognize community sovereignty—offers a more equitable and sustainable resolution. Such a transition is essential to reconcile ecological infrastructure maintenance with the welfare rights of marginal workers, thereby advancing social justice in water resource governance.References
Agyei-Mensah, S., Owusu, G., Awuni, C., Howard, B., Fuseini, I., Buytaert, W., & Berkhout, F. (2024). Chiefs and floods: hybrid governance and co-production of flood risk adaptation in Tamale, Ghana. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 26(6), 656–672.
Alia, S., Susanti, E., & Septiadi, M. A. (2024). Unraveling the Role of Actors in Sustainable Tourism Village Management Using the Pentahelix Collaboration Model in Bandung Regency. Proceeding of The International Global Tourism Science and Vocational Education, 1(1), 160–176.
Amengual, M., & Dargent, E. (2020). The Social Determinants of Enforcement. In The Politics of Institutional Weakness in Latin America (pp. 161–182). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108776608.007
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Bassi, A., & Gallagher, L. (2019). Integrated economic and spatial planning for the food-energy-water nexus. In Sustainable Infrastructure: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice (pp. 458–476). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0948-7.ch020
Bayat, A. (2010). Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=NqlPnD59LzQC
Beck, D., Veliz, P. T., Munro-Kramer, M., Boyd, C., Sakala, I., Chiboola, N., & Lori, J. (2021). Exploring change over time in community mobilization domains: results from a maternity waiting home intervention in rural Zambia. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01557-5
Bilalova, S., Jager, N. W., Newig, J., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2025). Successful water governance pathways across problem contexts: a global qualitative comparative analysis. Ecology and Society, 30(4).
Bobo, T. (2025). Guerra del agua in Bolivia: environmental discourse, power and the politics of ‘green.’ Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 27(4), 463–477.
Choi, T., Park, S., & Kim, J. (2025). Application of a DPSIR-Based Causal Framework for Sustainable Urban Riparian Forests: Insights from Text Mining and a Case Study in Seoul. Forests, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/f16081276
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298.
Dakyaga, F., Schramm, S., Lupala, J. M., & Magembe-Mushi, D. L. (2023). Geographies of Infrastructure: Everyday Governance of Urban Water Supply Beyond the Utility Network in Dar es Salaam. Water Alternatives, 16(3), 769–792. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85167837649&partnerID=40&md5=1e23defb36a48764f2e6d261bfd8e337
de Paula, M., Xerente, V., & Pezzuti, J. (2017). Hunting and monitoring: Community-based research in xerente indigenous land, Brazilian Cerrado. Human Ecology Review, 23(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.22459/HER.23.01.2017.02
Freire, D., de Wanderley, C. A., Fontes, A. L., & Lagioia, U. (2025). Research protocol in studies with semi-structured interviews. In Evolving Designs, Applications, Technological Advances, and the Future of Qualitative Research (pp. 181–194). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-4432-4.ch008
Gaikwad, P. (2017). Including rigor and artistry in case study as a strategic qualitative methodology. Qualitative Report, 22(13 Special Issue), 3431–3446. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85042637759&partnerID=40&md5=da893218a73a43fb7785742cb4e326cf
Gomez-Andujar, N. X., Woodill, A. J., Villegas, C., & Watson, J. R. (2024). Scarcity induces conflict in Puerto Rican fisheries. Environmental Research Letters, 19(12). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad8809
Gongora-Svartzman, G., & Ramirez-Marquez, J. E. (2022). Social Cohesion: Mitigating Societal Risk in Case Studies of Digital Media in Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria. Risk Analysis, 42(8), 1686–1703. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13820
Gwimbi, P., & Rakuoane, T. E. (2019). Impacts of Dams on Downstream Riparian Ecosystems’ Health and Community Livelihoods: A Case of the Lesotho Highlands Water Project. In Climate Change Management (pp. 257–276). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12974-3_12
He, S., Wang, D., Sang, X., & Niu, G. (2024). Water Resource Regulation and Evaluation Method Based on Optimization of Drought-Limited Water Level in Reservoir Group. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167015
Manwaring, R., & Holloway, J. (2023). Resilience to cyber-enabled foreign interference: citizen understanding and threat perceptions. Defence Studies, 23(2), 334–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2138349
Mattoni, A. (2020). A situated understanding of digital technologies in social movements. Media ecology and media practice approaches. In Technology, Media and Social Movements (pp. 112–123). Routledge.
Mezey, B. (2023). Right of the “Above” and the “Below”. On the Border of Customary Law and Custom: The Legal Customs. Acta Ethnographica Hungarica, 67(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1556/022.2022.00012
Migdal, J. S. (2023). Beyond state law: everyday rules and the fragile public. Journal of Chinese Governance, 8(4), 452–472.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. sage.
Rojas, R., Bennison, G., Gálvez, V., Claro, E., & Castelblanco, G. (2020). Advancing collaborative water governance: Unravelling stakeholders’ relationships and influences in contentious river basins. Water, 12(12), 3316.
Schneider, R., Muntifering, J., & Sullivan, S. (2025). Community-based conservation surveillance: an ethnographic analysis of the drivers and obstacles of local reporting on rhino and plains game poaching in Namibia. Biological Conservation, 311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111396
Suparman, N., & Septiadi, M. A. (2021). Government Political Communication in The Formulation of The Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, 24(2).
Tallman, P. S., Piland, N. C., Villarmarzo, M., Victoria-Lacy, L., & Valdés-Velásquez, A. (2024). Waterscapes meet socio-ecological models: A relational framework to examine water insecurity and human health and well-being. People and Nature, 6(3), 1036–1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10635
Tang, M., & Wang, K. (2025). Interactive Data Visualization for Collaborative Policy and Decision-Making: A Visual Exploration of Decision-Making in Policymaking.
Wade, E., Alexander, S. M., Gerkey, D., & Biedenweg, K. (2023). Exploring the Relationship Between Fishing Actors and Network Prominence in information-sharing Networks in Jamaican small-scale Fisheries. Human Ecology, 51(5), 877–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-023-00444-7
Wang, R., Qiu, H., Liu, R., Huo, H., Cheng, X., & Liu, X. (2025). A hybrid governance framework for adaptive and sustainable urban energy management. Sustainable Cities and Society, 130, 106638. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106638
Waskom, M. L. (2021). Seaborn: statistical data visualization. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3021.
Wati, R., Heriyanto, M., Adianto, A., Sutikno, S., & Febrian, A. F. (2025). Community-Based Social Capital as a Pillar of Disaster Mitigation in Coastal Areas. E3S Web of Conferences, 611. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561105001
Xu, K., Xia, J., Sheng, L., Wang, Y., Zu, J., Wang, Q., & Ji, S. (2024). Spatial Distribution Heterogeneity of Riparian Plant Communities and Their Environmental Interpretation in Hillstreams. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14125114
Yasmin, T., Farrelly, M. A., Rogers, B. C., Krause, S., & Lynch, I. (2022). Hybrid and multi-level adaptive governance for sustainable urban transformations in the global south: a secondary city case study. Frontiers in Water, 4, 756273.
Zhu, Z., Zeng, Y., Ye, J., Lu, Y., Sun, C., & Fang, G. (2026). Riparian ecosystem service supply–demand matching and its multi-scale responses to urbanisation. Ecological Engineering, 224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107867
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yudi Krisno Wicaksono, Dita Hendriani, Ivan Ashif Ardhana, Rizqi Bachtiar, Ima Frafika Sari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).